Dance and Choreography in HCI: A Two-Decade Retrospective
Publication: CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMay 2021 Article No.: 262 Pages 1–14 Designing computational support for dance is an emerging area of HCI research, incorporating the cultural, experiential, and embodied characteristics of the third-wave shift. The challenges of recognising the abstract qualities of body movement, and of mediating between the diverse parties involved in the idiosyncratic creative process, present important questions to HCI researchers: how can we effectively integrate computing with dance, to understand and cultivate the felt dimension of creativity, and to aid the dance-making process? In this work, we systematically review the past twenty years of dance literature in HCI. We discuss our findings, propose directions for future HCI works in dance, and distil lessons for related disciplines.
ダンスのための計算機支援のデザインは、第三の波のシフトの文化的、経験的、そして身体的特徴を取り入れたHCI研究の新しい分野です。身体の動きの抽象的な性質を認識することや、独特の創造的なプロセスに関わる多様な関係者を仲介するという課題は、HCI研究者に重要な問題を提示しています。創造性の感情的な側面を理解し、育成するために、そしてダンス制作プロセスを支援するために、どのようにコンピューティングを効果的にダンスと統合することができるでしょうか？本研究では、HCIにおける過去20年間のダンスに関する文献を体系的にレビューします。そして、その結果を考察し、今後のダンスにおけるHCI研究の方向性を提案し、関連する学問分野への教訓を導き出します。
1 INTRODUCTION
・身体の動きを通して実現される創造性の感覚的な次元を定義し、理解し、育成するために、コンピュータをどのように使用することができるか？
・複雑で独特な、そして非常に多様性に富んだダンス制作のプロセスにおいて、どのようにして振付家に効果的なコンピュータの助けを与えることができるのか？
ダンスの体現された創造性と表現力のマルチモーダルな理解に向けた将来の方向性を提案し、ダンス作りの社会的、文脈的、生活的な経験の複雑さをより広く認識することを求めるものである。
2 BACKGROUND: DANCE AND EXPRESSIVE BODY MOVEMENT IN HCI
3つの視点が交錯してる．
- いろいろな理論を使ってパフォーマンスにおける身体信号の新しい利用法を実験し，運動感覚的創造性のアイデアを研究
- モーキャプ等を用いて，ダンスにおける表現的な動きの質の重要な分析のための基盤を提供
- ダンス制作のためのシステムやツールの開発
以上より
・楽器としての身体
・拡張方法色々ある
・ interactive visualisations, costumes, and mechanical bodies
・どのようにしてダンサーのライブ体験の配信？を妨げないようにし，運動感覚的な創造性を促進させるか考慮しないといけない
・表現手段としてのムーブメント
・モーキャプ使えば表現の定量化できそうだけど，うまくいかない
・既存のフレームワーク，ラバン理論を使う場合が多い
・ラバン理論は動きの分析家らがチェック済み？神経学的にも立証されているらしいです．
・でもComputerVisionなどによる動きの質の認識はまだまだ発展段階
・実践としてのアートフォーム
・コンテキストの重要性をよりよく認識する
を紹介．
3 METHODOLOGY
528papersを収集．CHIとMOCOから．
色々処理，査読ありのみ，結果77papers
アフィニティーマッピングを用いて分析 テーマとカテゴリを特定
creating, performing, and analysingに分けた
デジタル付箋紙「Miro」っていうシステムを使って実施したらしい．
4 TYPES OF CONTRIBUTION
https://gyazo.com/b879daf64a7e5876d047ffbb222c5931
Figure 1: Types of contribution by the sampled papers distributed over time.
Table 1: Types of contribution by the sampled papers.
https://gyazo.com/1af259a69ae204b51baf9b5bb25051c4
5 TECHNOLOGY IN THE CREATIVE PROCESS
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1f6d9b0e1280022b81136.png
Creating Dance 38
choreography 22
Choreographer's notebook（C&C2018）
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ed391a2fa3001cdebd20.png
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ed3c939a7e001cdbd3b2.png
iDanceForms（MOCO2015）
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1edd1da63ba0022fa4a82.png
Knotation（CHI2018）
https://youtu.be/L_h2VRpwdgg
Delay Mirror（MOCO2017）
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ee477282210022be9956.png
Movement Matters（MOCO2017）
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1eefebee7ee001c24bfd7.pnghttps://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ef01dc600f001d46a58c.pnghttps://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ef04abacad001c0735fc.png
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ef066e6f68001c11ca7e.pnghttps://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ef09abacad001c073603.pnghttps://scrapbox.io/files/60b1ef0d400c82001c6741c3.png
Choreomorphy(AVI2018)
https://youtu.be/Pr5-tdQKod0
Dancing with Drones（CHI2019）
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1efeaa15dff001c23726b.png
stage 19/38
Reinterpreting Schlemmer’s Triadic Ballet: Interactive Costume for Unthinkable Movements （CHI 2018）
https://youtu.be/_32Tl6zLGTU
Live Dance Performance Investigating the Feminine Cyborg Metaphor with a Motion-activated Wearable Robot (HRI2020)
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1f2a8400c82001c67475a.png
Performing Dance 25
interactive performance 17
Aeroquake: Drone Augmented Dance (DIS2018)
https://youtu.be/yEza-51AQfQ
improvisation 8
TonightWe Improvise! Real-Time Tracking for Human-Robot Improvisational Dance(MOCO2019)
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1f9ac742129002207e87a.pnghttps://scrapbox.io/files/60b1f9b2ca9227001cd8d542.png
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1f9c13548b8001f1a7967.png
Analysing Dance 16
Observation and annotatio 12
Mova (MOCO2014)
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1fc5323a048001c4473cc.png
AWeb-Based System for Annotation of Dance Multimodal Recordings by Dance Practitioners and Experts(MOCO2018)
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1fd0375292c00221ce8b9.png
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1fd0756c3350022338086.png
BalOnSe(MOCO2014)
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1fd70da63ba0022fa50d9.png
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b1fd731aeaca001c01f720.png
ラバン身体動作表現理論 とは、ルドルフ・フォン・ラバン (Rudolf von Laban, オーストリア, 1879-1958)を中心とするドイツ表現主義舞踊の創作者らが1920～40年代に構築した、心理状態と身体運動の相関関係を規定する理論である。 英語では Laban Movement Analysis, LMA と称される。
I. Bartenieff and D. Lewis: Body Movement - Coping with the environment. Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1980.
ラバン理論以外の試み
Towards a Multimodal Repository of Expressive Movement Qualities in Dance. （MOCO 2016）
流動性（Fluidity）、衝動性（Impulsivity）、硬直性（Rigidity）
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b200f3bee7ee001c24c642.png
Three-Dimensional Visualization of Movement Qualities in Contemporary Dance (MOCO 2018)
https://scrapbox.io/files/60b20189fcea380021912dae.png
Model 6
other
Table 3: Use of technology in the dance project.
https://gyazo.com/a56471384c4b2dc5a5597604dd4cb45d
One is the direct measurement of dancers’ physiological signals through various sensors (i.e.,reading the body), and the other is the cultivation of the dancer's felt multisensory perception (i.e., writing the body).
reading body
動きだけではなくて，生体信号もとらえて，動き（外面）とダンサーの内面を同時に解析していく．マルチモーダルなアプローチ．精神．
writing body
テクノロジーをつかってダンサーを動かす．身体感覚を変化させる．これからも多くの試みが期待される．
まだまだ観客を含めた分析は実施されていない．オンラインだとどうなる？など．
hr.icon
REFERENCES
Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to
Ebrahim Babaei, Namrata Srivastava, Joshua Newn, Qiushi Zhou, Tilman Dingler, and Eduardo Velloso. 2020. Faces of Focus: A Study on the Facial Cues of Attentional States. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376566 Navigate to
Navigate to
Louise Barkhuus, Arvid Engström, and Goranka Zoric. 2014. Watching the Footwork: Second Screen Interaction at a Dance and Music Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557369 Navigate to
Bertha Bermudez and Chris Ziegler. 2014. Pre-Choreographic Movement Kit. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617995.2617997 Navigate to
Daniel Bisig and Pablo Palacio. 2016. Neural Narratives: Dance with Virtual Body Extensions. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948910.2948925 Navigate to
Maaike Bleeker, Jon Foley Sherman, and Eirini Nedelkopoulou. 2015. Performance and Phenomenology: Traditions and transformations. Routledge.
Navigate to
Lynne Anne Blom and L Tarin Chaplin. 1988. The moment of movement: Dance improvisation. University of Pittsburgh Pre.
Navigate to
Susanne Bødker. 2006. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476 Navigate to
Harry Brenton, Andrea Kleinsmith, and Marco Gillies. 2014. Embodied Design of Dance Visualisations. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617995.2618017 Navigate to
Antonio Camurri, Gualtiero Volpe, Stefano Piana, Maurizio Mancini, Radoslaw Niewiadomski, Nicola Ferrari, and Corrado Canepa. 2016. The Dancer in the Eye: Towards a Multi-Layered Computational Framework of Qualities in Movement. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948910.2948927 Navigate to
Yves Candau, Jules Françoise, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2017. Cultivating Kinaesthetic Awareness through Interaction: Perspectives from Somatic Practices and Embodied Cognition. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing(MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078042 Navigate to
Kristin Carlson, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Greg Corness, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2019. Shifting Spaces: Using Defamiliarization to Design Choreographic Technologies That Support Co-Creation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347122.3347140 Navigate to
Kristin Carlson, Thecla Schiphorst, Karen Cochrane, Jordon Phillips, Herbert H Tsang, and Tom Calvert. 2015. Moment by Moment: Creating Movement Sketches with Camera Stillframes. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757237 Navigate to
Kristin Carlson, Thecla Schiphorst, and Philippe Pasquier. 2011. Scuddle: Generating Movement Catalysts for Computer-Aided Choreography.. In ICCC. 123–128.
Navigate to
Kristin Carlson, Herbert H Tsang, Jordon Phillips, Thecla Schiphorst, and Tom Calvert. 2015. Sketching Movement: Designing Creativity Tools for in-Situ, Whole-Body Authorship. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2791007 Navigate to
Erin A Carroll, Danielle Lottridge, Celine Latulipe, Vikash Singh, and Melissa Word. 2012. Bodies in Critique: A Technological Intervention in the Dance Production Process. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145311 Navigate to
Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Wendy E Mackay. 2018. Knotation: Exploring and Documenting Choreographic Processes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174022 Navigate to
Royd Climenhaga. 2018. Pina Bausch. Routledge.
Navigate to
Rafael Kuffner dos Anjos, Claudia Ribeiro, and Carla Fernandes. 2018. Three-Dimensional Visualization of Movement Qualities in Contemporary Dance. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212721.3212812 Navigate to
Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the action is. MIT press Cambridge.
Navigate to
Katerina El Raheb, Aristotelis Kasomoulis, Akrivi Katifori, Marianna Rezkalla, and Yannis Ioannidis. 2018. A Web-Based System for Annotation of Dance Multimodal Recordings by Dance Practitioners and Experts. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212721.3212722 Navigate to
Katerina El Raheb, Nicolas Papapetrou, Vivi Katifori, and Yannis Ioannidis. 2016. BalOnSe: Ballet Ontology for Annotating and Searching Video Performances. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948910.2948926 Navigate to
Sara Eriksson, undefinedsa Unander-Scharin, Vincent Trichon, Carl Unander-Scharin, Hedvig Kjellström, and Kristina Höök. 2019. Dancing With Drones: Crafting Novel Artistic Expressions Through Intercorporeality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300847 Navigate to
Sarah Fdili Alaoui. 2019. Making an Interactive Dance Piece: Tensions in Integrating Technology in Art. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322289 Navigate to
Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Kristin Carlson, Shannon Cuykendall, Karen Bradley, Karen Studd, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2015. How Do Experts Observe Movement?. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2791000 Navigate to
Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Jules Françoise, Thecla Schiphorst, Karen Studd, and Frederic Bevilacqua. 2017. Seeing, Sensing and Recognizing Laban Movement Qualities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4009–4020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025530 Navigate to
William Forsythe. 2011. Choreographic objects. William Forsythe and the practice of choreography (2011), 90–92.
Navigate to
Nesrine Fourati and Catherine Pelachaud. 2014. Collection and Characterization of Emotional Body Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617995.2618004 Navigate to
William Gaver, Mark Blythe, Andy Boucher, Nadine Jarvis, John Bowers, and Peter Wright. 2010. The Prayer Companion: Openness and Specificity, Materiality and Spirituality. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753640 Navigate to
Petra Gemeinboeck and Rob Saunders. 2017. Movement Matters: How a Robot Becomes Body. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing(MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078035 Navigate to
Berto Gonzalez, Erin Carroll, and Celine Latulipe. 2012. Dance-inspired technology, technology-inspired dance. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design(NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399078 Navigate to
Martin Heidegger, John Macquarrie, and Edward Robinson. 1962. Being and time. (1962).
Navigate to
Thuong N. Hoang, Martin Reinoso, Frank Vetere, and Egemen Tanin. 2016. Onebody: Remote Posture Guidance System Using First Person View in Virtual Environment. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 25, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971521 Navigate to
Kristina Höök. 2018. Designing with the body: somaesthetic interaction design. MIT Press.
Navigate to
Kristina Höök, Martin P Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic appreciation design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3131–3142.
Navigate to
Kristina Höök, Anna Ståhl, Martin Jonsson, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, and Eva-Carin Banka Johnson. 2015. COVER STORY<br><br>Somaesthetic Design. Interactions 22, 4 (June 2015), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2770888 Navigate to
Stacy Hsueh, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2019. Understanding Kinaesthetic Creativity in Dance. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300741 Navigate to
Leva Janauskaitundefined and George Palamas. 2019. Establishing Dialogues Between Movement and Atmospheric Ambiances. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347122.3359602 Navigate to
Elizabeth Jochum and Jeroen Derks. 2019. Tonight We Improvise! Real-Time Tracking for Human-Robot Improvisational Dance. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347122.3347129 Navigate to
Andrew Johnston. 2015. Conceptualising Interaction in Live Performance: Reflections on “Encoded”. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2791003 Navigate to
Laewoo (Leo) Kang and Steven Jackson. 2018. Collaborative Art Practice as HCI Research. Interactions 25, 2 (Feb. 2018), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3177816 Navigate to
Laewoo (Leo) Kang, Steven J. Jackson, and Phoebe Sengers. 2018. Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173734 Navigate to
Pavel Karpashevich, Eva Hornecker, Michaela Honauer, and Pedro Sanches. 2018. Reinterpreting Schlemmer's Triadic Ballet: Interactive Costume for Unthinkable Movements. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173635 Navigate to
Heesoon Kim and James A Landay. 2018. Aeroquake: Drone Augmented Dance. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196798 Navigate to
David Kirsh. 2010. Thinking with external representations. AI & society 25, 4 (2010), 441–454.
Navigate to
Tollmar Konrad, David Demirdjian, and Trevor Darrell. 2003. Gesture + Play: Full-Body Interaction for Virtual Environments. In CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI EA ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 620–621. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765894 Navigate to
Kate Ladenheim, Reika McNish, Wali Rizvi, and Amy LaViers. 2020. Live Dance Performance Investigating the Feminine Cyborg Metaphor with a Motion-Activated Wearable Robot. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction(HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374837 Navigate to
Caroline Larboulette and Sylvie Gibet. 2015. A Review of Computable Expressive Descriptors of Human Motion. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2790998 Navigate to
Celine Latulipe, David Wilson, Sybil Huskey, Berto Gonzalez, and Melissa Word. 2011. Temporal Integration of Interactive Technology in Dance: Creative Process Impacts. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2069618.2069639 Navigate to
Jerrold Levinson. 2003. The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Navigate to
Matt Lockyer, Lyn Bartram, Thecla Schiphorst, and Karen Studd. 2015. Extending Computational Models of Abstract Motion with Movement Qualities. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2791008 Navigate to
Lian Loke, George Poonkhin Khut, Maggie Slattery, Catherine Truman, Lizzie Muller, and Jonathan Duckworth. 2013. Re-sensitising the body: interactive art and the Feldenkrais method. International Journal of Arts and Technology 6, 4 (2013), 339–356.
Navigate to
Lian Loke and Toni Robertson. 2011. The Lived Body in Design: Mapping the Terrain. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (Canberra, Australia) (OzCHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/2071536.2071565 Navigate to
Lian Loke and Toni Robertson. 2013. Moving and Making Strange: An Embodied Approach to Movement-Based Interaction Design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 1, Article 7 (April 2013), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442113 Navigate to
Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, Asreen Rostami, and Annika Waern. 2016. Embodied Sketching. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6014–6027. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858486 Navigate to
John McCormick, Kim Vincs, Saeid Nahavandi, Douglas Creighton, and Steph Hutchison. 2014. Teaching a Digital Performing Agent: Artificial Neural Network and Hidden Markov Model for Recognising and Performing Dance Movement. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617995.2618008 Navigate to
Helena M Mentis and Carolina Johansson. 2013. Seeing Movement Qualities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3375–3384. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466462 Navigate to
Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1982. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
Navigate to
Luis Molina-Tanco, Carmen Garc\’\ia-Berdonés, and Arcadio Reyes-Lecuona. 2017. The Delay Mirror: A Technological Innovation Specific to the Dance Studio. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing(MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078033 Navigate to
Teoma Jackson Naccarato and John MacCallum. 2016. From representation to relationality: Bodies, biosensors and mediated environments. Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices 8, 1 (2016), 57–72. https://doi.org/doi:10.1386/jdsp.8.1.57_1 Navigate to
Teoma J Naccarato and John MacCallum. 2017. Critical Appropriations of Biosensors in Artistic Practice. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing(MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078053 Navigate to
Radoslaw Niewiadomski, Maurizio Mancini, Stefano Piana, Paolo Alborno, Gualtiero Volpe, and Antonio Camurri. 2017. Low-Intrusive Recognition of Expressive Movement Qualities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction(ICMI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136755.3136757 Navigate to
Thomas Ots. 1994. The silenced body–the expressive Leib: on the dialectic of mind and life in Chinese cathartic healing. Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self 116 (1994).
Navigate to
Antti Oulasvirta, Teemu Roos, Arttu Modig, and Laura Leppänen. 2013. Information Capacity of Full-Body Movements. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1289–1298. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466169 Navigate to
Pablo Palacio and Daniel Bisig. 2017. Piano&Dancer: Interaction Between a Dancer and an Acoustic Instrument. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing(MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078052 Navigate to
Stefano Piana, Paolo Coletta, Simone Ghisio, Radoslaw Niewiadomski, Maurizio Mancini, Roberto Sagoleo, Gualtiero Volpe, and Antonio Camurri. 2016. Towards a Multimodal Repository of Expressive Movement Qualities in Dance. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948910.2948931 Navigate to
Katerina El Raheb, Marina Stergiou, Akrivi Katifori, and Yannis Ioannidis. 2019. Dance Interactive Learning Systems: A Study on Interaction Workflow and Teaching Approaches. ACM Comput. Surv. 52, 3, Article 50 (June 2019), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323335 Navigate to
Katerina El Raheb, George Tsampounaris, Akrivi Katifori, and Yannis Ioannidis. 2018. Choreomorphy: A Whole-Body Interaction Experience for Dance Improvisation and Visual Experimentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces(AVI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206505.3206507 Navigate to
Bernstein Ran, Shafir Tal, Tsachor Rachelle, Studd Karen, and Schuster Assaf. 2015. Multitask Learning for Laban Movement Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2791009 Navigate to
Jean-Philippe Rivière, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Baptiste Caramiaux, and Wendy E Mackay. 2018. How Do Dancers Learn To Dance? A First-Person Perspective of Dance Acquisition by Expert Contemporary Dancers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212721.3212723 Navigate to
Chris Salter. 2010. Entangled: technology and the transformation of performance. MIT Press.
Navigate to
Jan Schacher. 2018. What Quality? Performing Research on Movement and Computing. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212721.3212834 Navigate to
Richard Shusterman. 1999. Somaesthetics: A disciplinary proposal. The journal of aesthetics and art criticism 57, 3 (1999), 299–313.
Navigate to
Richard Shusterman. 2012. Thinking through the body: Essays in somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
Navigate to
Gilbert Simondon. 1958. Du mode d'existence des objets techniques. (1958).
Navigate to
Vikash Singh, Celine Latulipe, Erin Carroll, and Danielle Lottridge. 2011. The choreographer's notebook: a video annotation system for dancers and choreographers. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition(C&C ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/2069618.2069653 Navigate to
Dag Svanæs. 2013. Interaction Design for and with <i>the Lived Body</i>: Some Implications of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 1, Article 8 (April 2013), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442114 Navigate to
B. V. Syiem, R. M. Kelly, E. Velloso, J. Goncalves, and T. Dingler. 2020. Enhancing Visitor Experience or Hindering Docent Roles: Attentional Issues in Augmented Reality Supported Installations. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00053 Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to
Navigate to